Copyright © 2026 VPM, all rights reserved.
PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
VPM News Morning Edition
NEXT UP: 9:00 AM

Thanks to our sponsors – Become a Sponsor

Ruling Backs States Opposed To Obamacare; White House Expects Appeal

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

Another effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act gained steam last night. A federal judge in Texas ruled that the law is unconstitutional. We’re joined now by NPR’s health policy correspondent, Alison Kodjak. Alison, thanks so much for coming in.

ALISON KODJAK, BYLINE: Thanks for having me, Scott.

SIMON: This decision was received last night. What’s it say?

KODJAK: Well, it’s a pretty sweeping decision, actually. This judge ruled that the entire Affordable Care Act, which famously ran more than a thousand pages long, was unconstitutional. The case was brought by 18 Republican attorneys general, and it was led by Texas AG Ken Paxton.

And, you know, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled the Affordable Care Act is constitutional by calling the penalty for not having insurance a tax. And Congress has the power to tax people. So these attorneys general come in, and they argued that since Congress eliminated that tax penalty, the law can no longer stand. And that’s what the judge agreed to last night. And he took that argument, and he struck down the entire law.

Now, it’s going to be appealed.

SIMON: Yeah.

KODJAK: The attorney general of California’s already said so.

SIMON: Any immediate effect on anyone’s health care?

KODJAK: Well, it’s unclear. But at least the Department of Health and Human Services is saying that the Affordable Care Act will stand as this works its way through courts. And the funny thing is today is the final day for…

SIMON: Yes.

KODJAK: …Open enrollment for next year for people to get insurance. And on the website healthcare.gov, there’s actually a banner that says, this decision doesn’t change open enrollment for now.

SIMON: What about political repercussions?

KODJAK: And that’s a more complicated thing.

SIMON: Yeah.

KODJAK: So we just had midterm elections, as you know, and people really said health care is an important issue to them. And, you know, that’s not a surprise. But lots of Republicans were running ads during this midterm, saying that they were the ones who are going to protect people’s health care and, specifically, protect people with pre-existing conditions, which is one of those more sensitive issues around the Affordable Care Act. People want to make sure that if they’re sick, they can get insurance.

But in this lawsuit, these Republican attorneys general specifically argue that the pre-existing condition protections had to be struck down when that mandate went away. So now you have Republicans sort of trying to play both sides, which is going to be difficult.

And then there’s one other point that, you know, I think a lawyer made to me last night. Congress, in 2017, voted multiple times on whether to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and they didn’t do it. And now this judge has gone in and done it by himself. And one lawyer called this a breathtaking act of judicial activism.

SIMON: In the end, if the Affordable Care Act goes away, if it’s abolished, what can we expect to happen?

KODJAK: It will be – the repercussions will, you know, be far and wide. As I said, the law has more than a thousand pages. It touches every part of the health care system. So it’s not just these marketplaces that we talk about most of the time.

The most immediate impact is Medicaid expansion. More than 10 million people have gotten health care because states have expanded Medicaid to a larger population. The law guarantees that people up to age 26 can get insurance through their parents. That’s popular – that would go away. Again, the pre-existing condition protections – insurance companies have to give people coverage for their existing health problems.

But then, it also controls what Medicare pays doctors. It authorizes the Indian Health Service. It determines whether companies have to make accommodations for breastfeeding mothers. It makes chain restaurants put calorie counts on their menus. I mean, it’s everywhere.

SIMON: Yeah. Well, I mean, a lot of things have changed in American life.

KODJAK: Yeah.

SIMON: And that was the idea of the legislation. There are Americans who have changed their jobs. There are Americans who’ve changed what they do in life…

KODJAK: Yeah. If this just goes away…

SIMON: …To be able to get health care.

KODJAK: …It would wreak havoc across the country in many ways.

SIMON: NPR’s Alison Kodjak, thanks so much for being with us.

KODJAK: Thank you, Scott. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Tags

Alison Fitzgerald Kodjak is a health policy correspondent on NPR's Science Desk.

Her work focuses on the business and politics of health care and how those forces flow through to the general public. Her stories about drug prices, limits on insurance, and changes in Medicare and Medicaid appear on NPR's shows and in the Shots blog.

She joined NPR in September 2015 after a nearly two-decade career in print journalism, where she won several awards—including three George Polk Awards—as an economics, finance, and investigative reporter.

She spent two years at the Center for Public Integrity, leading projects in financial, telecom, and political reporting. Her first project at the Center, "After the Meltdown," was honored with the 2014 Polk Award for business reporting and the Society of Professional Journalists Sigma Delta Chi award.

Her work as both reporter and editor on the foreclosure crisis in Florida, on Warren Buffet's predatory mobile home businesses, and on the telecom industry were honored by several journalism organizations. She was part of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists team that won the 2015 Polk Award for revealing offshore banking practices.

Prior to joining the Center, Fitzgerald Kodjak spent more than a decade at Bloomberg News, where she wrote about the convergence of politics, government, and economics. She interviewed chairs of the Federal Reserve and traveled the world with two U.S. Treasury secretaries.

And as part of Bloomberg's investigative team, she wrote about the bankruptcy of General Motors Corp. and the 2010 Gulf Oil Spill. She was part of a team at Bloomberg that successfully sued the Federal Reserve to release records of the 2008 bank bailouts, an effort that was honored with the 2009 George Polk Award. Her work on the international food price crisis in 2008 won her the Overseas Press Club's Malcolm Forbes Award.

Fitzgerald Kodjak and co-author Stanley Reed are authors of In Too Deep: BP and the Drilling Race that Took It Down, published in 2011 by John Wiley & Sons.

In January 2019, Fitzgerald Kodjak began her one-year term as the President of the National Press Club in Washington, DC.

She's a graduate of Georgetown University and Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism.

She raises children and chickens in suburban Maryland.

Related Stories